Telltale Signs of Poorly Coached Youth Football Teams:
How can you tell if a youth football team is poorly coached versus a team that just has no players?
That is a very good question, other than the obvious organizational
signs (poor practice priorities), there is one simple sign that always
tells me if a team has talent or not. How is the team doing on defense?
Are they losing every game 50-0 or are the losses 20-6, 12-0, 18-6? Is
the team getting shut out a lot?
If a youth football team is
losing every game by 50 points they may be in one of those 100-1
“perfect storm” situations, a rarity akin to a Bigfoot sighting in
Kansas. But if they are doing "ok" on defense in spurts, it means the
team has a few athletes, but has no offense. How then can a youth
football team with a few athletes on defense and can hold their own
there in spurts, score so few points on offense? POOR FOOTBALL COACHING
Usually lots of "grab bagging" a little of this, little of that and
very little scoring too. Most of these teams run too many football
plays and the coach seems to always be looking for that one holy grail
of football plays to pull his offense out of the slump. These offenses
often change from week to week.
The head coach is responsible for
choosing the offensive scheme, teaching it and in most cases, calling
the football plays. There are plenty of offenses designed for even
small and slow teams. There is no reason why every youth football team
in America shouldn’t be averaging at least 20 points a game, even poor
teams. If your head coach or organizations teams consistently average
less than 20 points a game, the offensive scheme is either poor, or it
doesn’t fit the kids.
By the way, the kids aren’t having any fun
if they are getting shut out 4 of 9 games, kids want to score
touchdowns. The head coach chooses the scheme, he is 100% responsible
for his choice, hence if his system and his football plays fails to
consistently score points, it was a poor choice and his decision making
skills should come into question. What more is good youth football
coaching other than the summation of well made decisions? If the
coaches ego is so tied to the existing way of doing things that he will
not make changes that will benefit the kids, what does this say about
the coach? Is he in this for himself or the kids?
If you are
stuck coaching youth football or playing on a team like this, please
ask yourself or the head coach; "What exact changes are going to happen
this year that are going to insure that the team will score more points
than the previous season?" "What exactly, specifically is going to
change this year that is different from last year?"
If the
coaches answer is “Gee I hope we get a better “X” player”, Houston
there is a problem. Putting your hope in the football fairies to drop
the next Barry Sanders in your lap is not sound youth football coaching
and is the mantra of the excuse maker coach that wants to make the game
100% about who has the most talent, a lottery of sorts. That’s why I
don’t recruit stud players, if the local stud baseball, wrestler or
basketball player wants to play for us, great we will make sure
everyone on his wrestling, baseball and basketball team has one of our
flyers. But I could care less if the stud shows or not, we are going to
do well with whatever group of misfit toys santa drops on our doorstep.
That's
why I'm a bit leery of the "super recruiter" youth football coach that
puts so much of his effort into recruiting players. My preference is to
have a less talented youth football team, it’s more fun and more
rewarding winning with them than a team loaded with size and talent. If
you are stuck with a coach like the “Barry Sanders” wisher and can’t
convince him to change to an offense that is not talent dependent or he
will not admit he has a problem and needs to make some changes, look
for another team or organization to play in. Life is too short to waste
your time with such head in the sand incompetents, it is not worth the
frustration.
Back in 1999 we were losing lots of 18-6, 12-0
games. I admitted we had a problem and were going to fix it, not by
doing the same thing over and over and over again or putting in a few
new football plays and hoping for different results or waiting 10 years
for that one in a million player to be dropped on our laps. We
investigated other offenses and practice methodologies, switched to the
Single Wing Offense and in our first year out of the gate we averaged
about 35 points a game and won a league championship. Last year 13
different kids scored touchdowns on my personal team as we averaged
about 40 points per contest. In 1999 I had 3 different kids score
touchdowns, which team do you think had more fun? Larry Lourcey of
Plano, Texas had a youth football team that scored 4 TDs in 2005, in
2006 they switched to the Single Wing Offense with the same exact team
and scored 44 TDs with 11 different players scoring and went 10-0, now
that’s fun.
Getting shut out isn’t fun,ask your players. There
are hundreds of stories just like these, but they aren’t coming from
teams run by Mr Ostrich. Show "Mr Head in the Sand" some video of his
team and then a well coached Youth Football teams DVD that averages 40
points a game and let him decide for himself. If all he wants to do is
pray for Mr Superstud to land in his lap, or he has two new football
plays, change teams. Coaching Youth Football should be fun, it won’t be
if you have to coach with him.
Funny how even in 100% totaly
blind "draft leagues, that the same coaches win year after year.
Coaching youth football is not a lottery, don't let anyone feed you
that line.
Dave
Cisar- Dave has developed a detailed systematic approach to developing
youth players and teams that has enabled his personal teams to win 97%
of their games in 5 Different Leagues at all levels and age groups
while retaining 90% of his kids.
His book “Winning Youth Football a Step by Step Plan” was endorsed by Tom Osborne and Dave Rimington. His web site is Coaching Youth Football