I watch college football because it is rough, tough,
exciting and fun. The parity in college football today means no team is
safe from being upset on any game day. I do not watch college football
because it is beyond vicious.
After seeing Washington's
quarterback Jake Locker take a helmet-to-helmet shot against the Oregon
State Beavers Saturday (11-10-07), my emotions ran the gamut from
concern to anger to outrage to action.
No penalty was even
assessed for the flagrant shot. Not only should a penalty have been
assessed for unnecessary roughness or unsportsmanlike conduct, the
offending player should have been immediately ejected.
This kind
of illegal hit is not tolerated in professional football because the
player is defenseless when hit. Why it is even tolerated and celebrated
in college football is beyond me.
I do not care if the hit was
considered inadvertent or intentional. It does not matter. That
flagrant hit could have cost Jake Locker his career, it could have
paralyzed him for life, or even killed him if he suffered a broken neck.
This
kind of barbaric tackling is not football as much as controlled,
intentional mayhem. It was not that long ago that some coaches gave
bounties for these kinds of hits, especially when the star player on
the opponent's team was carried off the field on a stretcher.
Oregon
State players have developed a reputation for extreme play. In this
particular game, won by the Beavers 29-23, the officials appeared to
have lost control of the game as more taunting, pushing and shoving
resulted in 3 more Beavers and 1 Husky being kicked out of the game.
I
am not consoled by the fact that the Beaver player who delivered the
savage hit apparently apologized and was praying for Locker later. It
might have allowed the player in question to throw off any feeling of
guilt about the hit, but any amount of praying would not have helped
one iota if Locker had been paralyzed or killed as a result of the hit.
These
flagrant helmet-to-helmet hits have to stop. Period. Do not spend your
precious time trying to convince me these hits are inadvertent. Nine
out of 10 players do not even try to tackle players anymore. They throw
their bodies at them, hoping to knock them over.
Tackling might
be taught in spring training but it is seldom exercised on the field
anymore. Why do you think we are getting scores like 74-62 and 73-68
(these are real scores from real games). Defenders are using their
bodies as missiles to bring people down.
Instead of secretly
rewarding players for helmet-to-helmet shots, coaches need to bench
players who use the tactic to bring down players. Even if rules
committees do not allow the tactic, coaches have to implement and
enforce the rule to bring it to an end. Some coaches only seem to care
if it is their player who is on the receiving end of a vicious
helmet-to-helmet attack.
There have been enough tragic,
career-ending injuries in football at all levels when playing fair
without escalating the sport to mayhem with purposeful, flagrant
helmet-to-helmet hits.
Please do not give me this crap about
inadvertent helmet-to-helmet hits. A player can just as easily aim his
head at the runner's midsection or legs as his head if that is how he
wants to tackle someone.
When is the last time you saw a running
back get past the line of scrimmage in the open at his 30-yard line and
then run with his head down 70 yards toward the end zone? When is the
last time you saw a receiver catch the ball on his 30 and run with his
head down 70 yards for a touchdown?
When you do a
helmet-to-helmet hit you have to instantaneously calculate coordinates,
lower your head to projectile position and launch yourself into your
target. There are no accidental helmet-to-helmet hits.
Later that
same night I saw on a football wrap-up program that Hawaii's
outstanding quarterback Colt Brennen was on the receiving end of a
vicious helmet-to-helmet. I am sure the intention was to maim Brennen
so he could not stand up straight. Just like Locker, Brennen could have
become instantly paralyzed or even killed by the action.
How
stupid does this look for a college sport to be potentially killing its
players? The NCAA needs to take its feet off of the counter, stop
counting how much money its empire is generating, and address this
issue with authority. The NCAA has no problem being a major nuisance on
little stuff, how about tackling the bigger issue of its players'
safety?
If the NCAA ever had to open its books as a non-profit
corporation and come clean on how much money they are generating for
themselves, their faces would be redder than the sea of red among
Nebraska fans at a Cornhusker football game.
It almost goes
without saying that I was disappointed that Washington lost its away
game to Oregon State, lost its chance at a bowl game, and is now facing
its 4th straight losing season.
The unnecessary, flagrant helmet-to-helmet shot on Jake Locker only added to Washington's struggle to turn its program around.
Instead
of calling for Coach Ty Willingham's head and the heads of his
Washington coaching staff, how about saving Locker's head and every
other player's head who has needlessly suffered from an unconscionable,
flagrant helmet-to-helmet hit?
Copyright © 2007 Ed Bagley
Ed
Bagley's Blog Publishes Original Articles with Analysis and Commentary
on 5 Subjects: Sports, Movie Reviews, Lessons in Life, Jobs and
Careers, and Internet Marketing. My intention is to inform, educate,
delight and motivate you the reader.
Read my articles on "How to
Predict When Teams Are Overrated and Due for an Unexpected Loss", "The
Sagarin Ratings: What They Are, How to Read Them and What to Do With
Them" and my 14 consecutive weekly wrap-up articles on the 2007 College
Football Season.